We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"The product is very stable compared to older versions."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is the software deployment. Additionally, Microsoft integrates most of the other solutions well with one another."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
"With ASH Analytics, ADDM, Real-Time SQL Monitoring, SQL Tuning Advisor, we can measure SLAs, detect performance hotspots, perform deep diagnostics into specific tiers, tune applications, and remediate."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"The tool's deployment is difficult. Microsoft needs to improve documentation with videos."
"The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution."
"It would be nice to have everything in one place. Now they have Intune for the desktops and SCCM to handle their servers."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The solution is a bit heavy on the sources such as RAM or CPU and the software needs to be a bit lighter."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"In my experience, the monitoring could be improved."
"The solution has a very large resource system. It's too big. There are too many items."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"We would like to have a single dashboard for monitoring and controlling all of our products."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and PRTG Network Monitor. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.