We compared Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, Tanium is praised for its comprehensive visibility into endpoints, security measures, efficient endpoint management, and powerful analytics capabilities. Users appreciate the top-notch customer service but mention high pricing, complex licensing, and system performance improvements needed. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out for its threat protection, real-time monitoring, and user-friendly interface. Customers also commend customer service and competitive pricing, with positive ROI noted. Areas for enhancement include faster response times and improved documentation for both products.
Features: Tanium's valuable features include comprehensive visibility, effective security measures, efficient endpoint management, and powerful analytics capabilities. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers comprehensive threat protection, real-time monitoring and detection, efficient system management and reporting, user-friendly interface, seamless integration with other Microsoft products, and effective incident response capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Tanium is higher compared to other similar products in the market, requiring additional resources and time. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a more positive experience, with a straightforward setup process that doesn't require much effort., Based on user feedback, Tanium has shown positive ROI with improved efficiency, cost savings, enhanced security, and centralized IT management, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in threat protection, ease of use, and real-time insights.
Room for Improvement: There is room for improvement in both Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Tanium users have requested better system performance, improved documentation and training resources, and more customization options. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users have provided feedback on areas that could be enhanced.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, there is variation in the duration required to establish a new tech solution for both Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Some users of Tanium reported spending 3 months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others needed a week for both. As for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, some users mentioned the same timeframes for deployment and setup., Users highly praise the customer service of Tanium, citing helpful and responsive assistance from knowledgeable and professional support staff. Customers commend Tanium for their efficient and effective customer service. On the other hand, customers express satisfaction with the customer service of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, appreciating the support team's ability to address concerns and provide effective solutions. The quality of customer service provided by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is highly regarded.
The summary above is based on 96 interviews we conducted recently with Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"It comes included with the Windows license."
"We had certain compliance and usage issues. For example, our company wanted to go with CIS, but we didn't have a proper way of measuring whether the endpoints have the right standards in place or whether they were compliant with CIS. Microsoft Defender was like a one-stop for most things because it gave us the vulnerability and patching scores so that our vulnerability management teams can focus on covering up the vulnerabilities and the patching team can check the vulnerable versions and deploy the right versions."
"The threat hunting service is very useful for a security professional."
"Because it has been integrated with the OS, we get the entire software inventories, and we even get access to the registries. Those are the primary features."
"This product is flexible, and it is very easy to get updates from the Microsoft website."
"Ensures that I'm working with a product that gets updated regularly without me having to remember to do it. Since it's a Microsoft product, I'm confident that it requires a low use of system resources. The benefit of that being that my computer isn't constantly being drained."
"It is easy to use because it is already pre-installed in Windows 10. We don't have to do anything to configure it. You can also configure the firewall by using a group policy so that it can be easily adopted in an environment."
"I like that it's easy to deploy because it already comes with Windows 10. Overall, it has all the features that we need. Easy to deploy, comes with updates, and comes with Windows updates. You don't have to really manage or update the signature."
"I like the fact that you can create patching campaigns depending on the area of your network that you want to address first. I like the ability it has to make several campaigns that work in parallel."
"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."
"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."
"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."
"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."
"Tanium's most valuable features are patch management, inventory, and distribution software."
"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"It can get a bit laggy sometimes. Other than that, we don't have any issues. They constantly tweak it and fix it up based on users' feedback. It has improved a lot over the past four years. Defender for Endpoint never really used to be a good endpoint security solution, but over the past couple of years, Microsoft has invested heavily in it. So, it has come a long way in all aspects of endpoint security. If they want to make it better, they should just continue investing in the current path of what they've been doing over the past couple of years."
"The onboarding and deployment could be more user-friendly, and there is room to grow in some of the reports. I don't want them to be oversimplified or overly complex, but there is room for improvement in the reporting it can do. It's relatively minor."
"In India at least, it seems to be a bit more expensive than other options."
"I had some cases a while back and told an agent my issue. When I called the next day, I had to explain everything again to a different person, so I found it annoying to repeat myself all over."
"Integration with third-party vendors could be better. It would be better if it integrates with other protection solutions or other products outside of Microsoft. Nowadays, anti-virus protection doesn't really have to be planned as overall protection for your environment in terms of security. There are really different avenues that bad actors can take to wreak havoc on your machine."
"Microsoft Windows Defender doesn't have a game mode."
"If the solution could be integrated more with Defender for Cloud, to be more unified, that would help. It is good now, but even more integration could be done with Defender for Cloud. We see two different portals. If Defender for Endpoint could be ported to the CSPM, Defender for Cloud, that would make things even easier for us."
"Our team's knowledge of the solution needs to be improved, and Microsoft could do a better job conveying the necessary information to users. We could proactively use the tool more and explore capabilities we are not yet utilizing."
"We had some issues with the solution's OS upgrade."
"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."
"The solution needs to improve the reporting and tracking capabilities."
"The solution lacks mobility."
"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."
"The most painful thing is the interface. It's a bit unclear sometimes."
"The performance could improve in future releases. We have had performance issues in specialized web environments, but overall I think the problems are less than 2% of the computer systems being used."
"It is not really additional functions, or the features that are needed, rather the complexity would be reduced based on the number of modules required to put together a comprehensive operational security and risk compliance model."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 182 reviews while Tanium is ranked 36th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 15 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while Tanium is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "Useful tool for vulnerability management and deploying applications, needing improvement in its OS upgrade". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Tanium is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Qualys VMDR, ServiceNow Discovery and Tenable Security Center. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Tanium report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.