We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics SL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Supply Chain Management is an excellent feature."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is customization."
"The production is a valuable feature."
"The response time of the solution is very good."
"If anyone is familiar with Microsoft products then they can handle it easily."
"From a developer's perspective, the architecture of Dynamics has a well-designed security layer, which prevents coding issues between different layers. This is a significant advantage."
"The accounting and inventory management features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is material planning."
"If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature."
"The solution has provided a good return on investment by ensuring our financial and operational information is accurate and timely."
"It's pretty easy to set up."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX could be improved by having more features available. We are going to 365 now, to use all the modules, because we found that there weren't many new things we were able to develop with AX. There were a lot of things that weren't available, so we are moving and integrating other things. The customization of upgrades should also be faster. We would also like to see more security features."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX can improve system performance and security. The security is basic and needs a lot of improvement."
"It could be more scalable and stable. It would also be better if the interface were more integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem because 2012 is not really integrated."
"The manufacturing module in GP is quite basic, and those who require more advanced manufacturing capabilities often turn to third-party modules or tools."
"There is room for improvement when handling various currencies within the current Microsoft Dynamics AX system."
"The database requires a huge CPU and memory resources."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"There is also slowness in database backup."
"An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability."
"The product's primary improvement area would be its batch processing system."
"The licensing of the solution should be adjusted. The policies aren't ideal. They should make it easier to understand. Right now, it's too confusing."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 52 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics SL is ranked 22nd in ERP with 3 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Dynamics SL is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics SL writes "Reliable product with straightforward setup process ". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas Microsoft Dynamics SL is most compared with . See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.