We performed a comparison between Microsoft Exchange and OpenText GroupWise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very user-friendly application. The mail server is also valuable when compared to other services like SquirrelMail."
"I like the logistics and the Microsoft protocol of reaching Outlook anywhere."
"What I love about Microsoft Exchange is the good integration since 2013, particularly its integration with the calendar and other software such as Zoom, TeamViewer, AnyDesk, etc."
"Support is very good."
"The most valuable features are that you can exchange information, tasks, attachments, and enhance the process in a short amount of time."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It gives me benefit in terms of integration with other services such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and OneDrive. It makes my work much easier."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its ease of use."
"Very secure with great storage capacity."
"I like the ease of logging best in Micro Focus GroupWise. I also like its proxy capabilities from a user level. I also like how secure Micro Focus GroupWise is."
"The cost-effectiveness of the solution is most valuable."
"An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations."
"An improvement would be to combine Exchange and Teams so that emails, calls, and chats can be integrated into one window."
"They could improve on the search function, it takes too much time."
"In the version we have, I would like to see better communication between the end device and the Exchange server."
"If it was the same product, and slightly cheaper, that would be amazing."
"From a security perspective, Microsft Exchange can be improved. All that needs to be added is security, but that's an internal hierarchical problem from the product itself and not the end-users."
"The pricing could be better, and it could have an easier implementation."
"For new users, it might take them some time to get used to the product."
"What I don't like about Micro Focus GroupWise is the removal of the Unix client. Micro Focus took that function away about ten years ago because there wasn't enough demand for it."
"Their support can be improved. It is not as good as it used to be."
"The WebAccess feature is somewhat lacking and could be improved."
Microsoft Exchange is ranked 3rd in Email Applications with 78 reviews while OpenText GroupWise is ranked 12th in Email Applications with 3 reviews. Microsoft Exchange is rated 8.4, while OpenText GroupWise is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange writes "Very stable with an easy-to-use email management system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText GroupWise writes "It has proxy capabilities, is secure, and allows easy logging". Microsoft Exchange is most compared with Zimbra Collaboration, KerioConnect, HCL Domino, Open-Xchange and Veritas Enterprise Vault, whereas OpenText GroupWise is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online and Zimbra Collaboration. See our Microsoft Exchange vs. OpenText GroupWise report.
See our list of best Email Applications vendors and best Wireless Email vendors.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.