We performed a comparison between Microsoft Intune and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"The aspects I find most valuable are the managing the data and applications. I can also restrict the users to install any applications. I can also wipe the data if the phone was missplaced or stolen. These are the basics for me."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."
"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."
"This product offers an alternative solution to other UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"The product needs to upgrade itself when the server is overloaded."
"We need the capabilities of the Cloud Management Gateway (CMG) to be enhanced through Intune instead of Azure."
"I would like some integration with the Microsoft reporting platform Power BI."
"We only have major classifications for iOS and Android, but there are different brands that have different cycles of updates. If they can fine-tune it to make it more brand-specific, that would be even better."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 166 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.