We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is well-established, reliable, and compatible."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to understand and navigate."
"Technical support is good."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule."
"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."
"Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level."
"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"It may be considered expensive."
"The product's UI is not very user-friendly."
"Microsoft Project Server could improve by making the solution more user-friendly."
"When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases."
"Stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Resource management has room for improvement because it uses a lot of resources."
"The product is difficult to use for complex projects."
"I'd like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we'd like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time. While I only have visibility into one, I'd like to see several at a time."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 56 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 8.0, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, JIRA Portfolio and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.