We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable product."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It can scale well."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."
"For the collaboration functions, we use the commenting and quick model functions for process owners who don't have specific knowledge about Process Manager."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"The tool's navigation could be improved."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"I would like to be able to include images in the documentation."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."
"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."
"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Apache Airflow, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.