We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It is a scalable product."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"The product helps you to build faster."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful."
"The initial setup takes time."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"Pega's technical support could be better."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.