We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature in Okta Workforce Identity is the single sign-on, universal directory, and lifecycle management."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"Valuable features include UD, SSO functionality, MFA and Adaptive MFA functionality, ability to link multiple Directory databases with UD."
"It is a very stable solution."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"The product is expensive compared to other tools."
"It only facilitates provisioning and not de-provisioning."
"Application updates are lacking. Customer support needs to be improved."
"In my country, there's a lot of stealing of mobile phones, and mobile phones are the authentication device through the Okta application. If someone should steal my mobile phone, which is very common in my country, he or she might have access to my company account. That's my concern."
"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Access Management with 59 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 27th in Access Management. Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with . See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.