We performed a comparison between Oracle GlassFish and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Apache, Red Hat and others in Application Server."The products offers EE support."
"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"In WebLogic, the most useful feature is the UI administration console from where we can configure everything, such as security access, and we can start and stop it graphically. That's the best feature of WebLogic Server."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."
"It's a scalable product."
"What I find most valuable in Oracle WebLogic Server is its flexibility in administering and managing applications, along with the built-in dashboards that offer high visibility into vulnerabilities."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level connection problem to the corresponding WebLogic thread would greatly enhance the administrator's convenience."
"The pricing is a little bit higher compared to other products."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive."
Earn 20 points
Oracle GlassFish is ranked 9th in Application Server while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. Oracle GlassFish is rated 6.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GlassFish writes "Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". Oracle GlassFish is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and TmaxSoft JEUS.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.