We performed a comparison between Oracle OBIEE and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools."Dashboards provide us with various views and perspectives on our data, allowing us to analyze metrics such as revenue, occupancy rates, etc."
"They were reasonable in terms of price."
"It mostly supports enterprise level data. We have millions of records on a daily basis."
"The main features of this solution are that it is easy to use, intuitive, and user-friendly. When I retrieve the data from the database it is in a very raw form, then when I use the Oracle Report Builder it has advanced intelligence features to allow me to view and make changes to the data easily."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle OBIEE is its ease of use."
"There are a lot of functions in the product, including a drill-down functionality and level-based hierarchies that are very attractive."
"It provides excellent stability."
"The visualization is very good."
"Speeds up root cause analysis and can help identify issues that your organization never realized were occurring."
"The consolidated overview of all the events that come in through our environment and an easy-to-access interface for all our end users are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is the comprehensive logging capabilities it provides."
"The scalability is good."
"We can present to our management in real time the security of the batch management for the PCs, security regarding the network equipment. We're currently working in the Azure Cloud project, so we can send any logs from the cloud to Splunk. We can monitor them and we can present to the managers and customers. It's a very good solution for reporting. We use Splunk for reporting and monitoring of any solution in the company."
"What I really like is that even if you have already collected the data, you can extract fields and can build searches."
"I have found the installation can be of medium difficulty to very complex depending on the use case."
"Visualizations helped the organisation with a better understanding of its KPIs."
"The documentation in Oracle OBIEE can be more user-friendly."
"Even though we have a feature to enable the physical query to be seen in the log, in case of any issues, it is challenging to debug and see or identify where is the issue. For example, we designed the OBIEE repository and deployed it into the server, and we are now accessing and creating a report. For some reason, if the report is not working as expected, it is very difficult to identify the issue. We have a feature to see the physical query that is being generated in the central OBIEE server. I feel that this feature should have been available at the repository level so that while designing the repository, we can select the presentation columns and the query it is going to create. This will avoid the additional task of deploying a feature into the server and then testing the report. It will also make the implementation process friendly if, while designing the repository, we can see: How is a feature working? Are any of the presentation columns selected? How is the query being generated? Which query is being generated? Are any joints used? What kind of joints are used? Having this kind of information will make Oracle OBIEE more powerful and developer-friendly."
"I would like to see Machine Learning included in this solution."
"It is not a good product for data visualization."
"The pricing of the solution should be bettered."
"They should make the dashboard more intuitive."
"The development effort takes longer than other BI tools currently on the market."
"The platform's interface needs improvement."
"Splunk does not provide any default threat intelligence like Microsoft Sentinel, but you can integrate any third-party threat intelligence with Splunk. By default, no threat intelligence suite is there, whereas, with IBM QRadar or Microsoft Sentinel, the default feature of threat intelligence is there. It is free. If Splunk can provide a default threat intelligence suite, it would be better."
"I would like the ability to view logs for specific instances and not have to pull the logs for the entire Cloud environment in Splunk."
"The GUI can be improved. Splunk has always suffered from having a kind of goofy UI, it needs some updating."
"It would be nice if they had a wizard to construct searches, including more complex searches that include math or statistics."
"The solution could improve by giving more email details."
"I haven't found a way for me to create my own plugins and integrate them into Splunk, but this isn't necessarily a limitation; it could simply be a lack of knowledge on my part."
"Make it easy to use and the cost cheaper. This will help all organisations to implement Splunk."
"The solution could improve by making it more business analysis oriented. The way it is now is designed more for developers."
Oracle OBIEE is ranked 3rd in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 154 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 240 reviews. Oracle OBIEE is rated 7.8, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle OBIEE writes "A solution that is easily accessible, scalable and requires a straightforward initial setup process to get started". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Oracle OBIEE is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, IBM Cognos, Tableau and Oracle Analytics Cloud, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.