We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The ability to master the process in one location."
"It is stable."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.