We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The drag-and-drop feature is very valuable."
"Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."
"One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform."
"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"The scratch coding is useful. The solution is easy to understand."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"The PDD framework can't be used for the behavioral-driven development way of working."
"There are many tutorials available but they are very basic and good for learning the platform. To develop an enterprise-grade application, advanced tutorials need to be developed to help IT professionals design/develop high-quality/performance applications."
"While I can't speak to the market impact, as a developer, I've seen significant reductions in development time across different versions of our applications. One area for improvement would be the UI controls in Service Studio. Sometimes, controls don't appear in the IDE, requiring us to check them in the web browser instead. Overall, our experience with OutSystems has been positive, though improvements in UI development would be welcomed."
"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Unqork is ranked 25th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and QuickBase, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.