We performed a comparison between Salesforce Platform and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."We used it for providing a 360 view of the customers from within Salesforce. So, a lot of data got presented there, for which we used Einstein Analytics. The Einstein Analytics dashboards were really great."
"I found the ease of use most valuable in the Salesforce Platform. I also found the platform pretty light."
"The Salesforce Platform's most valuable features are everything in one place, perfect reporting, highly customizable, and easy to receive information you need."
"A great platform to import, manage and save customer data."
"The scalability of the Salesforce Platform is good."
"I like it because of the fact that it lets me know what I'm working on and what I've recently worked on. It also helps me and allows me to do tracking. If I want to go out and find out how many times I've touched customers, I can find that information out. It tracks such information, and we use it. If we send any type of promotions out, it tracks who gets those promotions and how they've responded to those promotions."
"One can do almost everything using Salesforce's OOTB functionality without much investment."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"I would like to see the organizational details improved to make it less difficult to bring new clients on board."
"The initial setup process was a complex thing to do because four different organizations were working together."
"Simplification is something it needs. Every time you get the engineers involved, they make things a little too complicated. It might be more beneficial to simplify everything for quick and easy reference."
"When we're documenting information such as notes, and so forth, if we were to go back to the same case all notes go missing."
"Technical support could be a bit faster."
"Easier process to move to Lightning Components."
"Salesforce Platform has a cumbersome interface when creating reports, dashboards, and those types of things. They could be a little bit more simple. The administration has to be an aficionado to do any sort of administration and maintenance, for example, setting up the way you want to modify the lead tracks or functions. These systems tend to be quite cumbersome."
"Although the platform is already set up for you, there's a lot of customization that needs to be done, especially for any new component we start using. For whatever solution we wanted, we had to think for ourselves and design it all on our own. And, unfortunately, there were some components that were not really mature in the beginning, like Tableau for example."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Salesforce Platform is ranked 9th in Rapid Application Development Software with 82 reviews while Unqork is ranked 25th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and Appium, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.