We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is IDE."
"It is a customizable product. We can customize it based on our needs, which is one of the features that I like about PeopleSoft. As far as financial accounting is concerned, the user interface is very good. You can also configure Chart of Accounts for all performance insights."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"The solution's scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature is ERP application information."
"The most valuable feature for us is the integration between the HR Payroll and Financials modules"
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I find everything I need in S4/HANA."
"The processes have been reduced from almost 10 steps to four or five steps. It's really been simplified."
"From a technology standpoint, the theory and analytics are fascinating."
"A robust product with integration between all modules."
"SAP S4HANA provides a solution towards a green industry. They keep making a different version of the solution to meet the needs of different industries, such as automotive and utilities."
"We have access to all types of reports in a single solution."
"The performance of the solution is excellent."
"One of the most valuable features, which we used the most, was the FI module, for finance. It involved controlling, account receivables, account payables, and complete financial steering."
"The API integration could be better."
"I would like to see better support, bug fixing, and documentation."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"PeopleSoft could improve by being more user-friendly. It's somewhat awkward to navigate."
"The user interface should be much more convenient and user-friendly."
"This product would be improved by adding more reports."
"The migration to SAP S/4HANA is hard."
"There should be an easier way to migrate customers from all versions to SAP S/4HANA."
"Planned Order List needs a change of screen."
"If S4HANA has more AI and machine learning, it will be better and easier for reporting and dashboarding."
"The product should improve its cost."
"There might be some restrictions in the public cloud."
PeopleSoft is ranked 12th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP HCM, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.