We performed a comparison between Ping Identity Platform and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a user-friendly solution."
"We use the product to run different reports."
"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."
"It's pretty stable as a product."
"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."
"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"The solution is highly stable and scalable"
"The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory."
"It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate."
"Symantec Siteminder Is both scalable and stable."
"The most valuable feature is the Federation part of Single Sign On, which is customizable and is easily integrated with any customer application or any third party application."
"Ease of use is very good, for administrating it. It's very well known."
"It is very scalable. We have a very large customer base: 75 million customers."
"I liked the debugging part. There are only two files (trace file and log file) that you need to look into while performing debugging, and the logs give you the exact info on where and what needs to be fixed."
"You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours."
"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."
"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."
"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."
"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."
"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."
"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."
"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."
"The product is not customizable."
"The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live."
"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly."
"All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem."
"The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur."
"In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication."
"We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation with SQL. Some better and more accessible documentation for new users or those curious about the product would be helpful."
"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration."
"Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved."
Ping Identity Platform is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 19 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 13th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 69 reviews. Ping Identity Platform is rated 8.4, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ping Identity Platform writes " A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". Ping Identity Platform is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, Microsoft Active Directory, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and RSA SecurID, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID and Red Hat Single Sign On. See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Symantec Siteminder report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
