We performed a comparison between Power Admin PA File Sight and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"It has the ability to correlate data, analyze and review it."
"I am satisfied with the support."
"Ease of correlation, creating correlation searches are easy and you can combine multiple sources with little effort"
"Compared to IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security offers faster alert resolution."
"Splunk would be my choice for the presentation layer because it comes with inbuilt reports and a dashboard that you can customize."
"If I need to integrate devices for logs, it is easier with Splunk. We can integrate different applications, network devices, and databases. It is also very rich in documents. It is the best."
"I like Splunk's data aggregation and search capabilities."
"It follows MITRE ATT&CK and Cyber Kill Chain frameworks. There are certain notable events for which we can configure our security posture."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
"There are new services which are coming up. If Splunk can catch up with the speed of Amazon, and with the integration, instead of us waiting for another year or so, that would be good."
"Splunk could be improved by reducing the cost. The cost is one of the biggest challenges for us in keeping to our production requirements."
"Over time I will have more requirements and I can foresee the solution could improve the search algorithm to run and output the data faster."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
"We would like more integrations with other cloud products, not just AWS, e.g., Azure."
"Splunk could add more ways to manage archiving and storage. There isn't a web interface. You can do this on the SaaS version, but the on-premise platform doesn't have this option. It has other things but no option for remote NAS. I would like to have a personal web interface where I can specify how long logs should be stored. To have this readily available on the web, you need to adjust some settings on the backend. That is tricky."
"The product is relatively expensive."
"We were inundated with the amount of alerts and alarms that we could get out of it. It is also a resource hog and we didn't have the resources to support it on-prem so we're taking it offline now."
Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 240 reviews. Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
