We performed a comparison between QlikView and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting."E-T-L, The Extract, Transform, and Loading capabilities of QlikView make it a highly sophisticated self-service business intelligence tool for developers and analysts."
"On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL."
"The solution is fast."
"One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running."
"The most valuable feature of QlikView is the integration with other third-party tools."
"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to view the entire data available for analysis."
"It's pretty easy to deploy."
"I had the option to prepare data myself instead of always having to depend on the data team."
"The most valuable features of the solution are it is straightforward to use and the documentation is good for finding out how to get the data you are looking for."
"We can automatically suspend or terminate suspicious sessions."
"It definitely does help with both auditing and as well as regular monitoring. SOC does more monitoring, but ES also gives you other features that are auditing-related. The dashboards are also beneficial."
"The ability to quickly search logs, performance data, and other inputs has helped tremendously with troubleshooting."
"Integrity with many vendors: This simplifies the implementation and integration with different devices"
"It is very easy to use and integrate. There are connectors for every technology."
"We have found all the features useful. However, the dashboarding and logging have been very helpful. Additionally, the log analysis does a great job."
"The initial setup isn't overly complex."
"QlikView's UI could be more user-friendly."
"I would want them to have more options as a user. It would be nice for them to create their own dashboards and add fields."
"The tool is expensive in Turkey."
"There is a challenge on the frontend when it comes to browsing data through QlikView, as it isn't entirely compatible with other platforms we use."
"The user interface is old."
"I really wish the application was easier to use in the development phase."
"It would be nice if QlikView could be plugged in into the company's website or an online portal such as QlikSense is capable of. There are ways around but it takes enormous time to develop."
"It needs work with visualization."
"Its setup is a little bit complex for a distributed environment. Their support can also be better. If we miss the response for more than a week, they usually close the case. Sometimes, it can take us more than a week to reply."
"It's costly."
"Some of the queries are difficult to run and have room for improvement."
"We had some connections issues with the solution at the beginning."
"The presence of multiple layers creates a significant challenge for monitoring across cloud environments."
"We had an instance when Splunk failed and it took us a couple of days to recover."
"The complexity could be worked on so that it's even easier and faster."
"The product was designed for security and IT with business intelligence needs, such as PDF exporting, but this has not been the highest priority. While the functionality is there, it could be developed more."
QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 246 reviews. QlikView is rated 8.2, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and Alteryx, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Dynatrace, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
