We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"It supports many external plugins, and because it's a Java-based platform, it's language-independent. You can use Java, C#, Python, etc."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel."
"It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays."
"Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way."
"Coding skills are required to use Selenium, so it could be made more user-friendly for non-programmers."
"If they can integrate more recording features, like UFT, it would be helpful for automation, but it's not necessary. They can also add a few more reporting features for advanced reporting."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"There are stability issues with Internet Explorer only."
"One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing."
"The initial setup was difficult."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA).
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.