We performed a comparison between Sophos EPP Suite and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It is a scalable platform."
"It's very simple to use. The managing of the endpoints is very easy."
"The anti-malware and web filtering are the solutions most valuable aspects."
"The solution efficiently protects the servers for our customers."
"Sophos EPP Suite has the capability to stop infections from spreading around the internal network even after the problems have infiltrated it."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the synchronized threat and ransomware protection."
"The solution's most valuable aspect, for us, is the DLP portion of the product."
"The central management of the anti-virus features for our end user is a very valuable aspect of the solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."
"The DLP and user interface are the most valuable feature."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."
"Technical support is always available and very helpful."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Detections could be improved."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The logging issues must be fixed."
"In the future, I would like to see better third-party integration so that it can work in conjunction with our ticket system."
"The solution could improve on the resource management, it is a bit heavy on the resources."
"The solution could improve in configuration and the central logging and dashboard."
"Sophos is lacking in the granularity of optimization, so having more control would be better."
"The solution is not easy to use in comparison to other endpoint security solutions."
"The product should improve support and provide more scalable clustering."
"The solution has a strange technical support process where you need to move through all of these tiers before you can get to someone who can help you. They should streamline the process and make it easier to speak to the correct level of support from the outset."
"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."
"The interface is complex."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"The local technical support could be better."
"The solution consumes a lot of end user memory and CPU. Trellix doesn't really focus much on the anti-malware side."
Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 55 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trend Micro Deep Security, Coro, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our Sophos EPP Suite vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.