We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"It allows us to provide all the information in one single place."
"It’s a stable product."
"The support is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the simple data connectivity components."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"There are a lot of different applications; you can connect PowerApps, or Flow, or Power BI to many different types of applications to interchange data."
"I would say that the most valuable features are the user interface, navigation, and business routes."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"In some cases, PowerApps would have some limitations in terms of the data, the number of transactions, and so on, but for a normal solution, it would be enough."
"As far as dealing with SharePoint, it'll allow you to ha manage up to 2000 rows, however, performance-wise, they're recommending that you just keep it at the default of 500 rows."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"When we talk of integrating with external applications, that's one area where, even today, I had to loop in my code developers. If this area can be streamlined so that my techno-functional consultants, who are on-site, can immediately start working on something without the assistance of developers, that would be ideal."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement."
"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."
"Installation and integration could be improved."
AgilePoint is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". AgilePoint is most compared with Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform, Camunda and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our AgilePoint vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.