We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."It is stable and the performance is good."
"We run it with no downtime, because it has good support."
"The stability of the solution is good. I don't think we've experienced bugs, crashes, or glitches."
"Our customers value the solution's simplicity."
"It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers."
"The most valuable features are the client VPN and content filtering."
"It significantly improved our overall web security posture, addressing intrusions and enhancing control over web URLs in our environment."
"Has a good dashboard."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"There are some vulnerabilities that are reported across the tools offered by Barracuda for some devices, which need to be taken care of from an improvement perspective."
"The solution needs to leverage some additional features to a broader scale of software-defined networks."
"One of Barracuda's limitations is its user interface. The GUI for configuration is not intuitive and has remained largely unchanged for the past 10 to 12 years."
"I would suggest that someone implementing this product is knowledgeable in the IT field, and with the network needs. It is complex."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall's load balancing feature could be improved."
"Barracuda Web Application Firewall’s scalability needs improvement."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The incident reporting needs to be improved."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 44th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, NGINX Plus and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.