We performed a comparison between Betty Blocks and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the back end."
"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"The platform has valuable features for opportunity and finance management. It has all the essential features for customer service."
"You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"It is very easy for us to implement. We have a Microsoft ecosystem, and this solution has many components for integration."
"There are a lot of different applications; you can connect PowerApps, or Flow, or Power BI to many different types of applications to interchange data."
"The most valuable feature is the time-to-market because you can make apps pretty fast."
"The most valuable feature is the completeness of the concept. It is not restricted by where you are allowed to use it and that is its greatest strength."
"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"I would like to see full integration with AI."
"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."
"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."
"The price could be lower."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."
"Improvements to the capturing of geographic locations and integration with maps would raise my score of the product from seven point five to its maximum of ten."
"Microsoft could streamline monitoring and management. In addition, it should be easier to put the solution in different environments. For example, you should be able to move from a dev environment to a production environment seamlessly."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"When we talk of integrating with external applications, that's one area where, even today, I had to loop in my code developers. If this area can be streamlined so that my techno-functional consultants, who are on-site, can immediately start working on something without the assistance of developers, that would be ideal."
Betty Blocks is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews. Betty Blocks is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Betty Blocks writes "The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Betty Blocks is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our Betty Blocks vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.