We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Commvault provides the status of a backup or restore operation."
"Scalability, as well as stability, are a couple of important parts of this solution."
"What I find valuable is restoring the complete server. Restoring files is also valuable, but I like restoring the server because you don't have to rebuild a new one."
"What I found most valuable in Commvault Complete Data Protection is its deduplication technique, mainly because the solution has the highest deduplication ratio, giving you higher storage capacity."
"Commvault can actually come in and assist you with aspects of the implementation - and they are quite helpful."
"The solution's interface is easy to use. For manageability, it doesn't matter where the resource is coming from or going to. That's the great power of the Control Panel: It's easy to use and does not matter if you manage on-prem or cloud resources."
"The most valuable feature is the ability it gives me to automate backups well and consistently, and to follow up on them as well. It also provides consistent recovery processes. Whenever we have needed to do a restore, it has worked quickly and efficiently."
"IntelliSnap and file system backups are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"I would like them not to push Command Center. It is good, but I would like them to enable all the features for the Java console. Some things are not in the Java console, like Office 365 agents. In fact, they are there, but one of the engineers had to show me how to configure it. It's not done the same as in the Command Center."
"The integration of Metallic could improve. It would be a benefit if Metallic could integrate with multiple applications or platforms."
"There are two ways to use it and I prefer the web-based one over the app. I wish they were a little bit more matched in what they offer because the features aren't as available in the web-based interface as they are in the app."
"What I need is deeper CLI documentation for both QCommand and SQL queries."
"The retention log feature could be an issue for us and can be improved. The backup schedule can also be better in terms of how you set it up."
"The solution needs better Office 365 data backup management."
"They reply to the support portal weekly, but there are some delays."
"Endpoint backup."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery with 104 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and AWS Backup, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Commvault Cloud vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
