We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If you want something that you can use for cellphones, multiple tablets, and things like that, you can use PowerApps for the front end. It gathers all the information, and the information goes somewhere else."
"The solution is easy to use and map."
"The most valuable feature is automized processes."
"It is good for using for small apps and automation on Office stuff."
"The solution is very straightforward. Its context is obvious and everything is easy to understand."
"We were impressed with the functionality of the solution."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"I would say that it's a very advanced product because it empowers people to do simple things, which previously may have required people to have some technical skills."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see custom APIs, better integration with other solutions, and more connectors available."
"The solution must provide more integration with third-party applications."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"It's easy to use."
"Microsoft PowerApps could improve the speed of Power Automate, it is not very fast."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Pillir is ranked 43rd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with . See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Pillir report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.