We performed a comparison between Parallels Access and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's got a very easy-to-use interface."
"We don't have problems with stability. Everything is good."
"Parallels Access gives me full access and control of the computer, and I can do anything I want remotely."
"It's great that the total deployment can happen completely remotely."
"Parallels Access has flexible licensing policies, which is beneficial for customers who have intermittent usage or users who are on and off the system."
"From my perspective, the most important is the login."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use and beneficial remote access."
"The document control is quite good."
"The most valuable features of I use TeamViewer are the ease of access and frequent updates."
"I am satisfied with TeamViewer, and its performance."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had a problem with it."
"It's pretty easy to use. Just key in an ID and password and connect. For meetings, just enter the meeting ID and connect."
"This solution is straightforward to use."
"The solution may not scale well for enterprises."
"One challenge we do notice is that the application is limited to Windows servers only. If a customer has a Linux server, things get complicated. They should open it up a bit to be more compatible with different types of servers."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing policy. The price point is pretty aggressive."
"They could improve the reporting."
"When you want to transfer a file from your iPad or remote device to the computer, the copy-and-paste feature doesn't always work."
"I am not sure about all the features of TeamViewer, but if they have no voice communication or file transfer features they should add them."
"TeamViewer can improve connectivity. I had some problems connecting to my clients and now I use AnyDesk."
"Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved."
"They should release features such as Augmented Reality into both plain and standard versions of TeamViewer."
"TeamViewer could improve by having support for other operating systems, such as Linux."
"The product can sometimes crash."
"It's pretty limited on the options they have."
"TeamViewer could improve by having a cloud version. Having the solution on the system could cause some cyber security concerns with data."
Parallels Access is ranked 12th in Remote Access with 5 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. Parallels Access is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Parallels Access writes "Allows users to access and operate their computers remotely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Parallels Access is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Splashtop Remote Support, VNC Connect, LogMeIn Pro and TeamViewer Tensor, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, ISL Online, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Webex. See our Parallels Access vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.