We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task."
"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"We need to have things run in a very sequential order, so it is very useful that we can schedule the work flows."
"It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 22nd in Workload Automation with 2 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "Excellent bulk data processing for large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory and MuleSoft Composer, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch. See our Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. AutoSys Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.