We performed a comparison between ACL Analytics and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the fact that in the duplicate section, I can find matches, and I can find situations where certain cells or certain cell points match, but there's a difference as well between two different records."
"The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."
"It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."
"It improved my organization using an automated audit revision with scripts."
"Initial setup is straightforward."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"Solution is scalable."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"The ease of use could be better."
"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."
"The product's pricing has increased over the years."
"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."
"The product is expensive."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"It's resource-hungry, that's the best way of putting it."
"GUI could be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"In a future release, there should be an option to upload the main data."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
ACL Analytics is ranked 6th in GRC with 5 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. ACL Analytics is rated 9.4, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ACL Analytics writes "Helps to find matches and also the situations where certain cell points match, but there's a difference between two different records". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". ACL Analytics is most compared with Galvanize HighBond, SAS Enterprise GRC, Workiva Wdesk and MEGA HOPEX, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream and Workiva Wdesk. See our ACL Analytics vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.