We performed a comparison between Acronis Disaster Recovery and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the product for me are its backup and recovery functionalities."
"Patch management, backup, and disaster recovery have been the solution's most valuable features for our data protection strategy."
"The backup and recovery options work flawlessly."
"Performance-wise, it works efficiently for backup and recovery compared to other tools."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery has good scalability."
"One key feature is it encrypts your data at rest which is really good."
"Our customers use Acronis Disaster Recovery for data backup."
"The solution can be improved by including a load balancer."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"The cost is acceptable."
"They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations."
"The product should improve compute points."
"The solution covers specific versions of Windows and Linux, and it would be good if other Linux versions or some special appliances could work in the Acronis Disaster Recovery environment."
"I wish the Disaster Recovery system could do more, like integrating irregularity features and combining VLP functionalities."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery should provide software information wherein I can change my setup to collect more information."
"The documentation can be improved, this would have helped."
"In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"I would like to see more security features."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
Acronis Disaster Recovery is ranked 18th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 10 reviews while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews. Acronis Disaster Recovery is rated 8.4, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acronis Disaster Recovery writes "Easy to implement and provides good features like patch management and disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Acronis Disaster Recovery is most compared with Arcserve UDP and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication. See our Acronis Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.