ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] vs Anakam.TFA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] and Anakam.TFA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
46th
Views
109
Comparisons
80
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
4TRESS
Learn More
HID Global
Video Not Available
Overview
AAA solution that provides physical and logical access coordination, internal threats protection for secure remote access.

Once users have access to a portal or applications, it is important to identify that the same users are returning in order to maintain security of the system and guard against account take-over, data loss and theft. Multifactor authentication is a simple yet secure way of knowing who is using your applications and ensuring that they are exactly who you expect them to be.

Our strong, multi-factor authentication product offers a range of layered, secure authentication methods in a single integrated platform. It delivers secure one-time passcodes via multiple vectors:

SMS (text messages)

Mobile app

Voice message (IVR)

Hard token

Out-of-band delivery of quickly expiring, one-time passcodes confirms that the person possessing the passcode is the one attempting to access your systems. Multiple authentication vectors ensure high-level security with user-required flexibility and usability.

If a biometric method is required or desired, two-factor authentication can also be done through voice biometrics – a secure, software-based method that doesn't require special hardware or detailed training.

Progressive authentication is our term for the best practice we pioneered—using an integrated set of tools and processes for situation-based authentication of known users seeking access to secure networks, data, and applications.

Based on your policy decisions, our solution will trigger authentication challenges at login or when suspicious transactions, unknown or risky devices, or out-of-norm behavior is recognized. These security authentication parameters can be customized in real-time for users both inside and outside your organization, progressively presenting authentication challenges based upon the latest threat assessment.

Sample Customers
Bodega Norton, Carlsberg and Kegspertise Keg, University of Reykjavik, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Alticor,Costa Rica Foreign Resident DIMEX Card, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Cinemark, City of Phoenix, RehabCare, PepsiAmericas, ServiceMaster, Exelon Corporation, Stein Mart
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Anakam.TFA is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems. ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Anakam.TFA is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ActivIdentity 4TRESS [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Anakam.TFA is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.