• Home
  • Adobe CQ5 vs. TerminalFour Site Manager

Adobe CQ5 vs TerminalFour Site Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
Adobe CQ5
Read 1 Adobe CQ5 review
558 views|471 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
TerminalFour Logo
TerminalFour Site Manager
Read 1 TerminalFour Site Manager review
187 views|168 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe CQ5 and TerminalFour Site Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Sanjeev_Gupta
TerminalFour Site Manager Review
Ranking
9th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
558
Comparisons
471
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
187
Comparisons
168
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CQ5
Site Manager
Learn More
Adobe
TerminalFour
Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals.
Sample Customers
Boehringer Ingelheim
University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company14%
Retailer10%
Construction Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Adobe CQ5 is ranked 9th in Web Content Management while TerminalFour Site Manager is ranked 19th in Web Content Management. Adobe CQ5 is rated 10.0, while TerminalFour Site Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Adobe CQ5 writes "Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TerminalFour Site Manager writes "TerminalFour Site Manager Review". Adobe CQ5 is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, whereas TerminalFour Site Manager is most compared with WordPress.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.