We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and ASP.NET based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"The UI is really good."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, scalability, and flexibility."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET."
"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"ASP.NET is stable. I did not have to do any maintenance on it."
"The main pro is that it's very easy and we have Microsoft helping to stabilize the product which is coming with the all new features every year."
"One of the most valuable features in ASP.NET is thread management with asynchronous processing. I've been implementing this for a few years and it has proven to be extremely helpful, especially when using a tool that wouldn't have worked without it. It's definitely a fundamental aspect of the platform."
"ASP.NET's best features are its application structure and API testing."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"The solution's initial setup is intermediate, and it could be improved."
"In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit."
"ASP.NET is not the best solution for all companies looking to implement a solution like it."
"The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while ASP.NET is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.