We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"The UI is really good."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integrated development environment. It also offers a very good integration with Microsoft Cloud."
"The most valuable feature is that it is a complete package, with an IDE and everything that you need for software development."
"I like the IDE or the integrated development environment. It's the best IDE."
"We can use different .NET features."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the way we are able to design code, deploy, and test our application. It is easy to move an artifact from the start to the deployment stage. It has well-defined processes that you can integrate with any team. Additionally, the solution is always improving."
"We have no issues with scaling."
"While you're coding, it's really nice to be able to print stuff out and make sure that all the data is being organized the way you want it to be."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the database connections."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It is simple to use for most developers and nearly impossible to use for non-developers."
"Technical support needs to be improved. Right now, it's not great."
"We'd like the solution to be more secure."
"The product could be improved by including axle intelligence."
"You do need to do some training in order to really take advantage of the solution."
"I would like to see more tools in the next release."
"Its setup process could be more straightforward."
"The hot reload feature is good, but sometimes it doesn't work. It could be improved."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our Adobe Flash vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.