Alteryx Designer vs IBM Cloud Pak for Data comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Alteryx Logo
7,954 views|6,577 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
4,032 views|2,639 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and IBM Cloud Pak for Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Alteryx Designer vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Alteryx Designer is a tool that is pretty much easy to install.""For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial.""The product is intuitive and easy to use.""The solution is user-friendly.""The most valuable features are the integrated properties and integrated connectivity.""It helps them to create customized workflows, transform data, perform calculations, and consolidate multiple data sources into a target database.""The product offers very good analytics.""When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis."

More Alteryx Designer Pros →

"The most valuable features of IBM Cloud Pak for Data are the Watson Studio, where we can initiate more groups and write code. Additionally, Watson Machine Learning is available with many other services, such as APIs which you can plug the machine learning models.""The most valuable feature of IBM Cloud Pak for Data is the Modeler flows. The ability to develop models using a graphical approach and the capability to connect to various sources, as well as the data virtualization capabilities, allow me to easily access and utilize data that is dispersed across different sources.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten.""The most valuable features are data virtualization and reporting.""Cloud Pak's most valuable features are IBM MQ, IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, and ISPF.""What I found most helpful in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is containerization, which means it's easy to shift and leave in terms of moving to other clouds. That's an advantage of IBM Cloud Pak for Data.""It is a scalable solution, and we have had no issues with its scalability in our company. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.""You can model the data there, connect the data models with the business processes and create data lineage processes."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Data Pros →

Cons
"The major concern in Alteryx Designer stems from the high costs attached to the product.""We need more documentation.""The price of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.""Optimizing processing times is one area I would like to see improved in Alteryx Designer. Sometimes, the workflows take an extremely long time to run. There are days when I have had to wait two to three hours for a single process to complete. There needs to be a functionality to split the processes.""It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer.""Its price can be improved. It is too expensive for our country. Because of its high price, we can't sell Alteryx Designer in this region. We used to be their reseller partner. There is also an additional cost for automating the data and running the flows, which makes it even more expensive. It will be very good if they can let users automate the data for free. Other solutions like Tableau provide this feature for free.""When configuring the Logix, the UA could be improved.""An improvement for Alteryx Designer would be faster bug fixes and updates."

More Alteryx Designer Cons →

"The tool depends on the control plane, an OpenShift container platform utilized as an orchestration layer...So, we have communicated this issue to IBM and asked if it is feasible to adapt the solution to work on a Kubernetes platform that we support.""One thing that bugs me is how much infrastructure Cloud Pak requires for the initial deployment. It doesn't allow you to start small. The smallest permitted deployment is too big. It's a huge problem that prevents us from implementing the solution in many scenarios.""The product must improve its performance.""The interface could improve because sometimes it becomes slow. Sometimes there is a delay between clicks when using the software, which can make the development process slow. It can take a few seconds to complete one action, and then a few more seconds to do the next one.""One challenge I'm facing with IBM Cloud Pak for Data is native features have been decommissioned, such as XML input and output. Too many changes have been made, and my company has around one hundred thousand mappings, so my team has been putting more effort into alternative ways to do things. Another area for improvement in IBM Cloud Pak for Data is that it's more complicated to shift from on-premise to the cloud. Other vendors provide secure agents that easily connect with your existing setup. Still, with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, you have to perform connection migration steps, upgrade to the latest version, etc., which makes it more complicated, especially as my company has XML-based mappings. Still, the XML input and output capabilities of IBM Cloud Pak for Data have been discontinued, so I'd like IBM to bring that back.""There is a solution that is part of IBM Cloud Pak for Data called Watson OpenScale. It is used to monitor the deployed models for the quality and fairness of the results. This is one area that needs a lot of improvement.""Cloud Pak would be improved with integration with cloud service providers like Cloudera.""The solution could have more connectors."

More IBM Cloud Pak for Data Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."
  • "Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."
  • "Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."
  • "I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."
  • "The licenses are expensive, making it difficult to consider acquiring additional licenses to the existing ones."
  • "Each license is something like $4,000."
  • "I rate the price of Alteryx Designer as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is a highly cheap product."
  • "I rate the price of Alteryx Designer a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More Alteryx Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that this product is too expensive for smaller companies."
  • "I don't have the exact licensing cost for IBM Cloud Pak for Data, as my company is still finalizing requirements, including monthly, yearly, and three-year licensing fees. Still, on a scale of one to five, I'd rate it a three because, compared to other vendors, it's more complicated."
  • "Cloud Pak's cost is a little high."
  • "IBM Cloud Pak for Data is expensive. If we include the training time and the machine learning, it's expensive. The cost of the execution is more reasonable."
  • "For the licensing of the solution, there is a yearly payment that needs to be made. Also, since it is expensive, cost-wise, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten."
  • "It's quite expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More IBM Cloud Pak for Data Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis.
    Top Answer:The only thing is sometimes it can be a bit slow.
    Top Answer:DataStage allows me to connect to different data sources.
    Top Answer:The product must improve its performance. We see typical cloud-related issues in the solution. IBM can still focus more on keeping the performance up and keeping it 100% available all the time.
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    7,954
    Comparisons
    6,577
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    423
    Rating
    7.8
    17th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    4,032
    Comparisons
    2,639
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    500
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloud Pak for Data
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Cloud Pak® for Data is a fully-integrated data and AI platform that modernizes how businesses collect, organize and analyze data to infuse AI throughout their organizations. Cloud-native by design, the platform unifies market-leading services spanning the entire analytics lifecycle. From data management, DataOps, governance, business analytics and automated AI, IBM Cloud Pak for Data helps eliminate the need for costly, and often competing, point solutions while providing the information architecture you need to implement AI successfully.

    Building on the streamlined hybrid-cloud foundation of Red Hat® OpenShift®, IBM Cloud Pak for Data takes advantage of the underlying resource and infrastructure optimization and management. The solution fully supports multicloud environments such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud™ and private cloud deployments. Find out how IBM Cloud Pak for Data can lower your total cost of ownership and accelerate innovation.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Qatar Development Bank, GuideWell, Skanderborg Music Festival
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Non Profit6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization19%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Computer Software Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Alteryx Designer vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx Designer vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 27 reviews while IBM Cloud Pak for Data is ranked 17th in Data Integration with 11 reviews. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while IBM Cloud Pak for Data is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Data writes "A scalable data analytics and digital transformation tool that provides useful features and integrations". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Data is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Azure Data Factory, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Palantir Foundry and SAS Data Management. See our Alteryx Designer vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data report.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.