Amazon Aurora vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,771 views|4,259 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
333 views|242 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy.""We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities.""The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively.""The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling.""Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.""The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer.""The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

More Amazon Aurora Pros →

"The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines.""The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced.""It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers.""There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired.""I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.""It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that.""The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement.""I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

More Amazon Aurora Cons →

"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback.""The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings.""Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks.""There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be lower compared to its competitors."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."
  • "I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
  • More Amazon Aurora Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in pricing. I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,771
    Comparisons
    4,259
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    7.6
    6th
    Views
    333
    Comparisons
    242
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

    Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

    Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

    Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

    The SingleStore platform combines transactional, analytical, and vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStore also combines the capabilities of traditional databases with the scalability of the cloud, making it suitable for a range of data-driven applications.

    SingleStore provides a unified platform that supports both transactional and analytical workloads, enabling real-time data processing and analysis. It is optimized for speed, offering low-latency data access and high throughput. The platform's distributed architecture allows it to scale horizontally, handling large volumes of data across multiple nodes. Additionally, it supports SQL, making it accessible for users familiar with standard query languages.

    Key features of SingleStore include real-time data ingestion, which allows for the immediate processing of incoming data, and a fully distributed SQL execution engine that enhances performance. The platform also offers in-memory rowstore and disk-based columnstore, providing flexibility in data storage and retrieval methods. Furthermore, SingleStore ensures high availability and disaster recovery with its multi-cloud, multi-region deployment options.

    When evaluating SingleStore, you should consider its ability to reduce query response times significantly, improve operational efficiencies with real-time analytics, and lower infrastructure costs through efficient resource utilization. Additionally, the platform's support for mixed workloads enables businesses to streamline their data operations, reducing the need for multiple specialized databases.

    SingleStore is implemented across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it helps with real-time risk analysis and fraud detection. In healthcare, it supports advanced analytics for patient data management. Retailers use SingleStore to optimize supply chain operations and personalize customer experiences through real-time data insights.

    Pricing for SingleStore is based on a subscription model, with costs determined by the resources allocated and the level of support required. It offers flexible licensing options to accommodate different business needs. SingleStore's customer support is known for its responsiveness and expertise, providing users with the necessary assistance to maximize the platform's potential.

    In summary, SingleStore offers a versatile and efficient cloud database solution suitable for handling diverse data workloads with high performance and scalability.

    Sample Customers
    Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel
    6Sense, Adobe, Akamai, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DBS Bank, Dell, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, Kakao, Kroger, LiveRamp, Lumana, NBC, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, Siemens, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, Sony, STC, TATA, and ZoomInfo.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Aurora is ranked 11th in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. Amazon Aurora is rated 7.8, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Easy-to-manage platform with a valuable auto-scaling feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". Amazon Aurora is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB and CockroachDB, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, CockroachDB and Oracle Database.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.