We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like many features, like the recently released useful analytics features. There are many from the data analytics or database side."
"It has helped reduce the cost by rationing the computing power and paying only on a per usage basis, instead of provisioning unneeded, idle, or unutilized computing power that is used only at 20% of its capacity or time."
"It's highly scalable. It's guaranteed 99.99% uptime, and it shows you can scale up or scale out whenever you need more space."
"It offers durability, high availability, fault tolerance, and a high TCO benefit."
"The ease of use is the biggest benefit."
"We can spin up the server anytime and have root access to it."
"The reason I like AWS is that they have a large market share and a large presence. When it comes to our use case, a big positive is that MuleSoft and AWS are working together very well. So instead of competing against each other, they're meshing together."
"Amazon AWS is good in terms of deployment and user experience. Their certificate management and load balancer are also good features."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"Like anything, Amazon AWS has room for improvement, but it's not bad."
"One thing that Azure offers that I think is good is Migrate appliance. So, Azure has a migrate appliance that allows you to run against workloads to determine the cost, preparedness, and scalability. I haven't found a similar feature in AWS. That kind of service would be great on AWS too if you could point it to the data center."
"Amazon needs to develop better tools for troubleshooting network traffic, application insights, performance, and even some aspects of integration mapping. I'm hoping AWS implements something like Azure's Network Watcher and a log analytics solution where a can pull logs from various services and present them in a single dashboard. I want to summarize the performance and usage of every service and application."
"There are numerous use cases, and the setup varies from complicated to very simple in some cases."
"Our API Management solution is integrated with Lambda, and last year, we had an issue while upgrading Lambda from version 8.0 to version 10. It seemed like Lambda runtime was changed by AWS, and there was a bug that caused the downtime. The loading of the dashboard is slow. It could be because I am located in China."
"In terms of improvement, they should try to give more emphasis to the VoIP system."
"Monitoring still needs to be improved."
"It's a good cloud, however, if I compare it with Azure, Azure is more of a feature-rich cloud."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Pantheon is most compared with Acquia Cloud, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Amazon AWS vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.