We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."Amazon AWS is user-friendly and intuitive."
"Amazon AWS has improved a lot on security and is very good. Additionally, You can integrate your own security into their AWS platform."
"Machine learning is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Amazon AWS are the EC2 instance for web applications with CDN Networks."
"AWS is easier to implement than other solutions, and it's more reliable."
"Amazon AWS contains a lot of helpful services."
"The initial implementation process is not difficult or complex."
"Their technical support is really good. I am very satisfied."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."
"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."
"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."
"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."
"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."
"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."
"In terms of technical features, I don't see anything missing. The only two points in favor of other providers are the price and local support. The main problem that we see here in Brazil is the price. It is much more expensive than any other cloud provider. Their local support can also be better. We get more support from some of the other providers here in Brazil as compared to AWS."
"The pricing of AWS is very unclear. They make it quite confusing."
"One of the issues I'm facing is that my RDS SQL Server version 5.8 is reaching its end of life, and I need to upgrade it to a customer-wanted version. I want to do this on Graviton instances, but Graviton only starts with version 8.0 and currently doesn't support the 5.8 series. We've raised a Priority Feature Request (PFR) with AWS to have this functionality added for at least three months. This would give us enough time to upgrade our database to the 8.0 version without any issues."
"Its subscription model or pricing model is too complex, which should be improved."
"Amazon AWS could be improved by lowering the general storage price."
"Some of the storage services could be cheaper."
"The solution can get to be a little expensive."
"I'd like the solution to be more plug-and-play."
"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."
"Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising."
"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."
"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."
". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."
"They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time."
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."
"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems and Smartsheet.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
