Amazon DynamoDB vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,905 views|3,377 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Neo4j Logo
247 views|220 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon DynamoDB and Neo4j AuraDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Managed NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Managed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its subscription cost is lower than similar databases offered by other vendors."
  • "You can get committed capacity or transaction-based pricing. If you're doing it on demand, they charge based on whether you're reading or writing. They charge $1.25 for every million rights to the database and 25 cents for every million reads from the database. The first 25 gigabytes of storage are free, and they charge 25 cents a gigabyte a month. So, it's a very different world. It's a quarter a gigabyte a month. You can store a lot of data. They have a separate fee for automated backup, and if you want it globally distributed, where it's distributed around the world, there's a slightly different price."
  • "I would rate the pricing for this solution a four out of five."
  • "It is a little expensive."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the pricing a seven. It is not the cheapest, but it is not the costliest either."
  • "Amazon DynamoDB is cheap."
  • "Compared to a high-end relational database, it's cheap."
  • "For our use case usage, DynamoDB's pricing was okay. However, for high-traffic applications, the pricing structure becomes less attractive."
  • More Amazon DynamoDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We don't have to administer the tool.
    Top Answer:We use the document database. The primary key is quite slow. The free tier is quite hard to use.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to emulate MongoDB for the document database.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    3,905
    Comparisons
    3,377
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    510
    Rating
    8.5
    8th
    Views
    247
    Comparisons
    220
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. You can use Amazon DynamoDB to create a database table that can store and retrieve any amount of data, and serve any level of request traffic. Amazon DynamoDB automatically spreads the data and traffic for the table over a sufficient number of servers to handle the request capacity specified by the customer and the amount of data stored, while maintaining consistent and fast performance.

    Available on AWS and Google Cloud in over 45 global cloud regions, deploy AuraDB in close proximity with your application in the region of your choice¹. AuraDB’s architecture ensures you can migrate to or across clouds seamlessly, and operate everywhere with consistency and performance. With AuraDB, you avoid cloud vendor lock-in with the freedom of choice.

    Sample Customers
    Samsung, Snapchat, Capital One, Expedia, Tinder, Airbnb, Comcast, Lyft, Redfin, Netflix, Adobe
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Managed NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon DynamoDB is ranked 2nd in Managed NoSQL Databases with 29 reviews while Neo4j AuraDB is ranked 8th in Managed NoSQL Databases. Amazon DynamoDB is rated 8.4, while Neo4j AuraDB is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Amazon DynamoDB writes "Manages our contact center dynamically and allows us to store multiple data attributes in tables". On the other hand, Amazon DynamoDB is most compared with Amazon DocumentDB, Google Cloud Bigtable, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Amazon Neptune, whereas Neo4j AuraDB is most compared with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Amazon Neptune.

    See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.