"Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."
"The product's initial setup was very straightforward and not complex."
"They handle the backup process quite well. They automatically encapsulate it, including container backups, without relying heavily on the client's involvement. This is a significant advantage compared to other providers where clients often need to manage the process more independently. It's a feature that I find suitable and beneficial."
"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Scalability and availability are the most valuable features of Amazon Elastic Container Service."
"In seven years, we have not faced a single second of downtime."
"The solution is easy to scale and implement and provides performance monitoring and management tools."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service’s initial setup is a bit difficult."
"The product should improve its price."
"While it is generally stable, there have been some issues, especially when working on client projects where troubleshooting was needed."
"EC2 is not self-explanatory enough."
"I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten. It easily dies."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service needs to improve the menu design. It needs to improve deployment with better documentation."
"The orchestration of the workloads running in ECS needs improvement."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Azure Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 1st in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 46 reviews while Microsoft Azure Container Service is ranked 2nd in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 7 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Azure Container Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Container Service writes "Reliable, expandable and great for Microsoft-heavy environments". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas Microsoft Azure Container Service is most compared with .
See our list of best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Containers as a Service (CaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.