We performed a comparison between Amazon EMR and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a variety of options and support systems."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data."
"Amazon EMR's most valuable features are processing speed and data storage capacity."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."
"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."
"This is the best tool for hosts and it's really flexible and scalable."
"The solution is extremely stable. That's the most important aspect of the solution, for our organization. There is no downtime, and the performance is very good."
"Anyone currently using SAP will be transitioning to HANA."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the modeling of the databases."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"SAP HANA's most valuable features are monitoring, reporting, and price and stock control."
"SAP HANA's best features are its programmability and extensibility - you can size and shape the software however you need."
"It is difficult for me to narrow down what the best features are in SAP HANA because they work together to provide the overall functionality of the solution. However, the Fiori application is very good."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The problem for us is it starts very slow."
"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."
"The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better."
"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."
"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."
"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."
"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."
"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"SAP HANA's long run time to extract data could be improved upon."
"The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it."
"They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem. Its price could be better. It is expensive."
"When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems."
"Needs graphical programming without coding."
"There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle."
"The initial setup was pretty complex, considering the enormous amount of data they had from an Oracle ERP."
Amazon EMR is ranked 3rd in Hadoop with 20 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 1st in Embedded Database with 79 reviews. Amazon EMR is rated 7.8, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EMR writes "Provides efficient data processing features and has good scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Amazon EMR is most compared with Snowflake, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift and Oracle Exadata, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Amazon EMR vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.