We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."
"I value the API integrations."
"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."
"The installation is very easy to do and understand."
"The most valuable features of MongoDB are the variety of translations available and the ability to deploy it on the cloud is useful. The cloud users can access the data, work on the data, and if they want to import or manipulate some data they can."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."
"The aggregation framework is really good, allowing a developer to build very complex queries."
"In our case, it is most important to have redundancy."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"The dashboard is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"The improvements could be made to intelligence to detect disk storage and prevent MongoDB from crashing."
"They could improve the UI and the analytics part."
"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"It would be much more useful if I have an admin user and a password."
"It should have GUI for managing clusters. MongoDB needs a more powerful GUI to manage clusters and make switchovers. Currently, there is no good, free tool to check the replication to find out if there is a gap."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Amazon QLDB is most compared with , whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.