Amazon QuickSight vs Anaconda comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
15,869 views|14,269 comparisons
56% willing to recommend
Anaconda Logo
2,704 views|2,040 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QuickSight and Anaconda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is simple to implement.""I like that with Amazon QuickSight, you don't need to install an app to use its services. With other BI tools, you need to install the app, so Amazon QuickSight is better for me in this area.""A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface.""Easily able to connect with our other services and easy to manage.""It is notably fast in handling large data set refreshes, making it efficient for data analysis.""Compared to other reporting tools, it is very effective but does require an understanding of certain concepts in QuickSight. This understanding is crucial for creating dimensions, changing metrics, and visualizing reports.""The ease with which it integrates with different data sources is most valuable. Especially when everything is on AWS, it is easy to connect to the data source and organize different dashboards."

More Amazon QuickSight Pros →

"I can use Anaconda for non-heavy tasks.""The notebook feature is an improvement over RStudio.""It helped us find find the optimal area for where our warehouse should be located.""The best part of Anaconda is the media distribution that comes as part of it. It gets us started very quickly.""The most advantageous feature is the logic building.""The most valuable feature is the Jupyter notebook that allows us to write the Python code, compile it on the fly, and then look at the results.""The documentation is excellent and the solution has a very large and active community that supports it.""The virtual environment is very good."

More Anaconda Pros →

Cons
"The product has some storage and SPICE data issues.""An area for improvement in Amazon QuickSight is storage. Data cleanup also needs improvement because I'm experiencing errors when cleaning the data. Amazon QuickSight needs video tutorials showing its different functions and purposes.""It can be made more user-friendly as some users might find this solution hard to implement. Qlik Sense, for example, is very user-friendly.""Amazon QuickSight has minimal features. The feature set can be improved to allow you to create good production-ready dashboards. This does not happen with QuickSite, it needs to mature to be used in production.""It should support integration with Python or R.""There could be an end-to-end pipeline for data cleaning as well as presenting it using different visualizations.""I just want a few more features to be added.""The number of features in the product is limited in comparison with the other tools in the market, like Power BI."

More Amazon QuickSight Cons →

"The solution would benefit from offering more automation.""One thing that hurts the product is that the company is not doing more to advertise it as a solution and make it more well known.""The ability to schedule scripts for the building and monitoring of jobs would be an advantage for this platform.""Anaconda can't handle heavy workloads.""Anaconda should be optimized for RAM consumption.""Having a small guide or video on the tool would help learn how to use it and what the features are.""I think that the framework can be improved to make it easier for people to discover and use things on their own.""When you install Anaconda for the first time, it's really difficult to update it."

More Anaconda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices."
  • "It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."
  • "Amazon QuickSight you subscribe and you use the service."
  • "The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."
  • "The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department."
  • "I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."
  • "The pricing is cost-effective with a good plan."
  • "A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."
  • More Amazon QuickSight Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing costs for Anaconda are reasonable."
  • "The product is open-source and free to use."
  • "My company uses the free version of the tool. There is also a paid version of the tool available."
  • "The tool is open-source."
  • More Anaconda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: It helped the managers to visualize the data activities.
    Top Answer:They could provide more options for graphics and other features. It has a lot of limitations compared to other database platforms.
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
    Top Answer:Anaconda could benefit from improvement in its user interface to make it more attractive and user-friendly. Currently, it's boring.
    Ranking
    Views
    15,869
    Comparisons
    14,269
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    7.1
    13th
    Views
    2,704
    Comparisons
    2,040
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    457
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    QuickSight
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

    Anaconda makes it easy for you to install and maintain Python environments. Our development team tests to ensure compatibility of Python packages in Anaconda. We support and provide open source assurance for packages in Anaconda to mitigate your risk in using open source and meet your regulatory compliance requirements.

    Python is the fastest growing language for data science. Anaconda includes 720+ Python open source packages and now includes essential R packages. This powerful combination allows you to do everything you want from BI to advanced modeling on complex Big Data

    Sample Customers
    MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com
    LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    University7%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Non Tech Company9%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon QuickSight is ranked 4th in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 24 reviews while Anaconda is ranked 13th in Data Science Platforms with 15 reviews. Amazon QuickSight is rated 6.8, while Anaconda is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon QuickSight writes "Useful for developing dashboards for various lines of business". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Anaconda writes "Offers free version and is helpful to handle small-scale workloads". Amazon QuickSight is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Looker, Google Data Studio and Qlik Sense, whereas Anaconda is most compared with Databricks, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Amazon SageMaker, Microsoft Power BI and IBM SPSS Statistics.

    We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.