Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud Spanner comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,253 views|7,505 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Google Logo
1,546 views|1,207 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon RDS and Google Cloud Spanner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud Spanner Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool is very easy to use and configure.""Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing.""The solution's customer service is excellent.""Amazon RDS is a scalable solution.""Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality.""It is very easy to set up initially.""The initial setup is straightforward, and technical support is good.""The IT is easy to set up, which is the best."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"We can scale the solution if we need to.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically.""Google Cloud Spanner is stable.""The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

More Google Cloud Spanner Pros →

Cons
"Currently, speaking of Microsoft SQL on RDS, you don't have a full option to be able to use it directly on RDS. So, it needs improvement.""The product should support new databases.""In the next release, it would be great to have access to core parameters to improve or tweak the performance.""The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution.""It would be helpful if they made it easier to migrate from an existing on-premises solution to the cloud-based service.""Amazon has a policy of automatically restarting the server every seven days.""Amazon RDS needs to have an overall dashboard where I can view all the tables in the form of pie charts and Gantt charts. The deployment is complex, and we would like to see automated scripts. It needs to incorporate performance insights.""The solution's version upgrade and performance could be improved."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine.""I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure.""The cost can be a bit high.""The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling."

More Google Cloud Spanner Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Spanner Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID transactions, and provides excellent integration and monitoring tools as well as… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,253
    Comparisons
    7,505
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    8th
    Views
    1,546
    Comparisons
    1,207
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Google Spanner
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud Spanner
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud Spanner and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon RDS is ranked 1st in Database as a Service with 45 reviews while Google Cloud Spanner is ranked 8th in Database as a Service with 4 reviews. Amazon RDS is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud Spanner is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon RDS writes "Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Spanner writes "A stable and scalable relational database that ensures a return on investment for its users". Amazon RDS is most compared with MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud SQL, SQL Azure, Oracle Database as a Service and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, whereas Google Cloud Spanner is most compared with MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and SQL Azure. See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud Spanner report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.