We compared Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Amazon WorkDocs based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is praised for its team collaboration, customer service, affordable pricing, valuable ROI, and need for collaboration and document management enhancements. On the other hand, Amazon WorkDocs shines with its file collaboration, version control, customer service, positive ROI, competitive pricing, and areas for improvement in document synchronization and interface.
Features: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is valued for its ability to facilitate team collaboration, manage documents, enhance communication, and provide a centralized platform. It offers integration with other Microsoft Office apps, customization options, and robust security measures. In contrast, Amazon WorkDocs is praised for efficient file collaboration and sharing, seamless integration with existing Amazon services, reliable version control and document syncing, enhanced security measures, and a user-friendly interface.
Pricing and ROI: Comparing the setup cost between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Amazon WorkDocs, both products are regarded as affordable and competitive. However, users appreciate the flexibility in licensing options offered by Microsoft, while Amazon's setup cost is reported to be straightforward and hassle-free. Additionally, users find licensing in Amazon WorkDocs to be flexible and convenient for individuals and organizations., The ROI of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is praised for its integration and collaboration features, centralizing information, and improving communication. Users also mention cost savings and increased efficiency. On the other hand, Amazon WorkDocs is appreciated for its increased efficiency, seamless collaboration, improved organization, and enhanced productivity. Users also mention cost savings and reduced expenses.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Office SharePoint Server could benefit from enhancements in collaboration features, document management capabilities, user interface, and overall performance. Amazon WorkDocs needs improvements in document synchronization, intuitive interfaces, search functionality, file sharing options, storage capacity, performance, collaboration features, integration, and mobile access.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server indicate varying timeframes for deployment and setup, with some users mentioning three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, while others mentioned a week for both. On the other hand, reviews for Amazon WorkDocs mention that deployment alone took one week, while setup required an additional week for some users. Another user reported a total of four months for the entire process. Additionally, one user mentioned being able to establish the new tech solution within a few days without differentiating between deployment and setup., Users have reported exceptional customer service and support capabilities for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server. They praise the prompt and effective assistance, knowledgeable staff, and willingness to exceed expectations. Conversely, Amazon WorkDocs receives high praise for its helpful and efficient customer service, resolving issues promptly and providing a positive experience.
The summary above is based on user interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Amazon WorkDocs users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"This solution is great for inviting and sharing documents with other users."
"The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling."
"The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."
"It's a very robust product."
"The most valuable feature is the "Alert Me", which provides the ability to set an alert when content is either added or changed and that the alerts can be either real-time or aggregated for the day or the week."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."
"The software is friendly to use for mixing data and analyzing it."
"I had a very bitter experience with their mobile app."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it."
"I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications."
"It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are concerned, it is moving more towards configuration management rather than programming. When we are doing solutions, we are basically just configuring it to make solutions happen rather than actually using the Visual Studio code and developing from scratch in the cloud. It is almost like creating an app. You have created an app for your phone, but the app doesn't really sit on your phone. It sits somewhere on a server, and the database sits on another server. The app is just pulling and pushing information. The whole development has changed. We used to install things directly on the server and then run the application from the server. Now, it is more of a modular architecture."
"The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations."
"I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications."
"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."
"Workflows could be simplified."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Amazon WorkDocs is ranked 5th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Amazon WorkDocs is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon WorkDocs writes "A great collaboration service for small organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". Amazon WorkDocs is most compared with Office 365, Google Workspace, SharePoint, Quip and Dropbox, whereas Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HighQ.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.