We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"We're able to get real-timec as well as our customer networks that we're monitoring at all times."
"Easy alert setup which enables different alerts in different categories."
"The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good."
"This solution offers extensive customization options, making it possible to adapt it precisely to their requirements."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM is easy to use."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM's most valuable feature is the simplicity in handling multi-tenancy and the ability to switch between different clients at the same time. That was handled flawlessly."
"We have many application systems, and I can set up Fortinet FortiSIEM for users to monitor their systems."
"The primary valuable feature is that it has replaced a whole lot of other products with one platform."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"Not very good on non-API features, lacks that functionality."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve by having a signature update."
"Creating parsers to try make unknown events or currently unsupported devices produce meaningful information is extremely cumbersome."
"It's difficult to integrate unsupported devices with FortiSIEM compared to QRadar. It's easier to integrate and develop processes in QRadar. It's harder to develop a custom process in FortiSIEM."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve by having better integration and extensions. This would benefit by allowing us to give more rules."
"If there is a configuration on the wrong side of the network or there are changes that result in harm to our IT infrastructure, the solution should immediately fix it."
"The biggest thing that could be better is a quicker response to support cases."
"Their technical support is horrible. By horrible, I mean a train wreck of a disaster that has fallen off a bridge and caught fire."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 5th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 9th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), ThreatQ, Splunk Enterprise Security and Group-IB Threat Intelligence, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
