We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and USM Anywhere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"It has allowed us to see what is happening on our servers."
"The vulnerability manager and the file integration are very good."
"I can easily check (in one place) all the logs and data in relation to attacks. It also gives me an overview if a server is not configured properly."
"The IDS and the threat intelligence are very useful. They are very intuitive and data-rich."
"The ease of implementation is the most valuable feature."
"It allows for a lot of out-of-the-box features: vuln scanning, HIDS/HIPS, and IDS."
"It provides a single pane of glass view, coupled with a whole security ecosystem. The ability to manage everything from a central point, including vulnerability assessments, asset management - including the services provided by the various hosts, NIDS, HIDS, etc. - provides a very efficient way of dealing with things."
"Vulnerability scanning helped out shortcomings of what was not patched in the past and what needed to be patched. This assisted with fine tuning the environment for compliance."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"Search performance can be slow. The Raw Logs feature is painfully slow. And if we're talking about the newer, the Anywhere product, you can't even schedule reports on the thing. There are probably a dozen other features I'd really like to see there, but that would be one of the biggies."
"There are many reports included but would be nice to have better access to the data."
"Source material on the forums to be more up-to-date with the changes happening within the product. Forums being out-of-date with information due to the changes makes troubleshooting a little more difficult - specific to the HIDS agents."
"Maybe logs are the problem, as the database query is too slow. If you want to search something, you need time to find it."
"Adding a parsing interface for the customers would make AT&T AlienVault USM better."
"Different functions to customize reports should be added."
"The one thing I continue to dislike about the USM is the limitation on reports."
"We've had some stability problems, not a lot, but a few. Updates seem to be the worst. That seems to be when the stability problems come up."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 5th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while USM Anywhere is ranked 11th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 113 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while USM Anywhere is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of USM Anywhere writes "Easy to use and affordable". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), ThreatQ, Splunk Enterprise Security and Group-IB Threat Intelligence, whereas USM Anywhere is most compared with Wazuh, AlienVault OSSIM, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
