We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.