We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is user-friendly."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The product is stable."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"We have faced scenarios where Apache Airflow becomes non-responsive, leading to job failures. To resolve such situations, we had to manually reboot Apache Airflow since it doesn't provide an option to restart within the application. This necessitated modifying some configurations to initiate a restart of all Apache Airflow components. Although Apache Airflow is generally dependable, it may occasionally encounter glitches that can disrupt production flows and batches."
"The documentation must be improved."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Pega BPM and Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.