Apache Spark vs Netezza Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,498 views|1,884 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
235 views|103 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.
To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Apache Spark provides a very high-quality implementation of distributed data processing.""The distribution of tasks, like the seamless map-reduce functionality, is quite impressive.""Its scalability and speed are very valuable. You can scale it a lot. It is a great technology for big data. It is definitely better than a lot of earlier warehouse or pipeline solutions, such as Informatica. Spark SQL is very compliant with normal SQL that we have been using over the years. This makes it easy to code in Spark. It is just like using normal SQL. You can use the APIs of Spark or you can directly write SQL code and run it. This is something that I feel is useful in Spark.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its memory processing because it processes data over RAM rather than disk, which is much more efficient and fast.""The solution is scalable.""The deployment of the product is easy.""I like that it can handle multiple tasks parallelly. I also like the automation feature. JavaScript also helps with the parallel streaming of the library.""The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution.""For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable.""Speed contributes to large capacity.""The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution.""It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data.""The most valuable feature is the performance.""Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."

More Netezza Analytics Pros →

Cons
"The management tools could use improvement. Some of the debugging tools need some work as well. They need to be more descriptive.""This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed.""In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""The solution’s integration with other platforms should be improved.""At times during the deployment process, the tool goes down, making it look less robust. To take care of the issues in the deployment process, users need to do manual interventions occasionally.""Include more machine learning algorithms and the ability to handle streaming of data versus micro batch processing.""The solution must improve its performance.""At the initial stage, the product provides no container logs to check the activity."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support.""Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two.""Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing.""This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available.""In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there.""The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this.""The Analytics feature should be simplified.""I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life."

More Netezza Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
  • "For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
  • "The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
  • More Netezza Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:Here are some things to consider when migrating from Netezza to AWS Redshift A. Migrating your data from Netezza to Redshift may be done using methods such as: o Use a third-party tool to export… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,498
    Comparisons
    1,884
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.7
    11th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    235
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    IBM Netezza Analytics is an embedded, purpose-built, advanced analytics platform that empowers analytic enterprises to meet and exceed their business demands. As features, it can predict with more accuracy, deliver predictions faster and respond rapidly to changes.
    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    A leading online advertising network
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hadoop
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.