We performed a comparison between Apigee and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is monetization."
"The opportunity for customization is really vast and it is a really good feature built into the product."
"API/proxy lifecycle workflow for API providers is quite good and one of Apigee's strongest features."
"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."
"Apigee has proven to be one of the best of the breed."
"Apigee is very easy to use, and you can code in any language."
"Apigee gives you plenty of opportunities to set up your workspace depending on how you want to manage your APIs."
"The security that you have with Apigee is very good and aligns with compliance."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"The reporting is really nice."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."
"I have heard there maybe be some security issues that need to be addressed. If this is the situation I would encourage taking a look at the security matters."
"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."
"Sometimes there are glitches, which means there's still room for improvement in the platform."
"I would like to see SOAP services and socket-based connectivity developed."
"The entire user across all the layers should be singly authenticated through an external authentication system."
"The cost of the solution is quite high."
"The solution tends to hide the limitations to keep selling the product."
"Role-based access management needs to be improved. It would also be nice if the solution could be integrated with code versioning systems like Git/Bitbucket."
"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."
"More and more artificial intelligence (AI) is coming in. So, some amount of AI to create natural language processing (NLP)-based test cases and manage defects would be very helpful. This is because the technologies have evolved in the last five to six months, so there is a potential opportunity there."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."
Apigee is ranked 6th in API Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 2nd in API Testing Tools with 96 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Apigee vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
